The reflex mechanism underlying the neuromuscular effects of whole-body vibration: Is it the tonic vibration reflex?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7462-1358en_US
dc.contributor.authorÇorum, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorTopkara, Betilay
dc.contributor.authorKökçe, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorÖzkan, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorBucak, Ömer Faruk
dc.contributor.authorAytüre, Lütfiye
dc.contributor.authorKaracan, İlhan
dc.contributor.authorTürker, Kemal Sıtkı
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-11T18:18:37Z
dc.date.available2023-10-11T18:18:37Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.departmentDiş Hekimliği Fakültesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Whole-body vibration (WBV) is applied to the sole of the foot, whereas local mechanical vibration (LMV) is applied directly to the muscle or tendon. The time required for the mechanical stimulus to reach the muscle belly is longer for WBV. Therefore, the WBV-induced muscular reflex (WBV-IMR) latency may be longer than the tonic vibration reflex (TVR) latency. The aim of this study was to determine whether the difference between WBV-IMR and TVR latencies is due to the distance between the vibration application point and the target muscle. Methods: Eight volunteers participated in this study. The soleus reflex response was recorded during WBV, LMVs, and tendon tap. LMVs were applied to the Achilles tendon and sole of the foot. The latencies were calculated using the cumulative averaging technique. Results: The latency (33.4±2.8 ms) of the soleus reflex induced by the local foot vibration was similar to the soleus TVR latency (30.9±3.2 ms) and T-reflex (32.0±2.4 ms) but significantly shorter than the latency of the soleus WBV-IMR (42.3±3.4 ms) (F(3,21)=27.46, p=0.0001, partial ?2=0.797). Conclusions: The present study points out that the neuronal circuitries of TVR and WBV-IMR are different.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage42en_US
dc.identifier.issn1108-7161
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35234157en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85125567380en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage37en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11363/5840
dc.identifier.volume22en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000960022700005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorTopkara, Betilay
dc.institutionauthorTürker, Kemal Sıtkı
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJMNI, 7 SPILIADOU SQ, NAFPLION 21 100, GREECEen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactionsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectExerciseen_US
dc.subjectMuscle Spindleen_US
dc.subjectMuscle Vibrationen_US
dc.subjectStretch Reflexen_US
dc.subjectTendon Vibrationen_US
dc.titleThe reflex mechanism underlying the neuromuscular effects of whole-body vibration: Is it the tonic vibration reflex?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
JMNI-22-037.pdf
Boyut:
913.42 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale / Article
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ N/A ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.56 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Web of Science ve Scopus Atıf Dizinlerindeki Yayınlar
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu