Using different types of aggregates including waste concrete in the production of geopolymer mortars

dc.authorscopusid57200729840
dc.authorscopusid57200568790
dc.authorscopusid38362627300
dc.authorscopusid57200720472
dc.authorscopusid57200727063
dc.contributor.authorCanpolat, Orhan
dc.contributor.authorŞahin, Furkan
dc.contributor.authorUysal, Mucteba
dc.contributor.authorAl-Mashhadani, Mukhallad M.
dc.contributor.authorAygörmez, Yurdakul
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-11T19:58:39Z
dc.date.available2024-09-11T19:58:39Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentİstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesien_US
dc.description5th International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, SCMT 2019 -- 14 July 2019 through 17 July 2019 -- Kingston upon Thames -- 149940en_US
dc.description.abstractIn developed and developing countries, the need for industrial and residential buildings is constantly increasing. The old buildings are either demolished or replaced by new buildings in order to maintain environmental awareness and due to limited usage areas. In this construction process, traditional Portland cement is used and also a serious solid waste problem arises due to the demolished buildings. Because of using Portland cement, a significant amount of greenhouse gas production is generated, as well as high levels of environmental pollution due to the accumulation of concrete solid wastes. New laws have been enacted in many countries to reduce greenhouse gas emissions due to Portland cement and for solid waste management, and even the establishment of recycling facilities for waste concrete has been encouraged. The reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and recycling of construction wastes have gained great importance both because of the protection of the natural environment and its contribution to the economy.In this study, more environmentally friendly geopolymer additives were used instead of traditional Portland cement for the recycling of construction waste, as well as geopolymer mortars were produced with different types of aggregates. The 0.4% basalt fiber additive series of the obtained samples were similarly produced. The geopolymer samples produced by using different aggregate types including the waste concrete aggregate were compared in terms of 28 days compressive strengths, ultrasound velocities, unit weight, voids ratio and water absorption results. © 2019 International Committee of the SCMT conferences. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipYildiz Teknik Üniversitesi, (2016-05-01-DOP04)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by research fund of the Yildiz Technical University, the authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to scientific research coordination unit for their financial support to the project (Project number: 2016-05-01-DOP04.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2515-3048en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85070985102en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11363/8537
dc.identifier.volume2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Committee of the SCMT conferencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSustainable Construction Materials and Technologiesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.snmz20240903_Gen_US
dc.subjectBasalt fiber; Geopolymer; Metakaolin; Slag; Sustainable; Waste concreteen_US
dc.titleUsing different types of aggregates including waste concrete in the production of geopolymer mortarsen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Makale / Article
Boyut:
291.85 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format