The role of ultrasonography in the imaging of body packers comparison with CT: a prospective study
dc.authorid | BULAKCI, MESUT/0000-0003-0993-6465; | |
dc.contributor.author | Cengel, Ferhat | |
dc.contributor.author | Bulakci, Mesut | |
dc.contributor.author | Selcuk, Tuba | |
dc.contributor.author | Savas, Yildiray | |
dc.contributor.author | Ceyhan, Muhammet | |
dc.contributor.author | Kocak, Ayhan | |
dc.contributor.author | Bilgili, Cigdem Ozkara | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-11T19:50:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-11T19:50:10Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.department | İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This study investigated the sonographic properties of drug packets containing narcotic drugs and the diagnostic role of ultrasonography in detecting body packing in comparison with CT. Forty-five suspects admitted to our hospital for diagnosis and management were routinely evaluated by non-contrast CT for the presence of drug packets. A single radiologist blind to CT data independently performed the abdominal ultrasonographic scans. Thirty-five of 45 suspects were carrying packets. In positive cases, two types of packets with different properties were noted. Twenty-eight cases had type 1 packets (solid form drug) and 7 had type 2 packets (liquid form cocaine). The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of ultrasonography for detecting drug packets were 91%, 70%, 91%, and 70%, respectively. Ultrasonography accurately determined the presence or absence of packs in 39 of 45 suspects. Ultrasonography was found to have a high sensitivity but a low specificity in suspected cases. A negative ultrasonography cannot rule out the diagnosis of body packing. However, it may be preferred as the initial imaging method or for follow-up of suspected cases as a radiation-free, easy-to-use, and inexpensive technique. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00261-015-0430-z | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 2151 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0942-8925 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1432-0509 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 7 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 25906342 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84942502403 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 2143 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0430-z | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11363/7578 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 40 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000361835700007 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q2 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Abdominal Imaging | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.snmz | 20240903_G | en_US |
dc.subject | Body packing | en_US |
dc.subject | Drug smuggling | en_US |
dc.subject | Abdominal ultrasound | en_US |
dc.subject | Computed tomography | en_US |
dc.title | The role of ultrasonography in the imaging of body packers comparison with CT: a prospective study | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Dosyalar
Orijinal paket
1 - 1 / 1