Comparison of electrocautery and scalpel for blood loss and postoperative pain in Pfannenstiel incisions in recurrent cesarean sections: A randomized controlled trial

dc.authorscopusid16032891100
dc.authorscopusid56820085300
dc.contributor.authorAğar, Eser
dc.contributor.authorKarakoc, Gokhan
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-11T19:57:30Z
dc.date.available2024-09-11T19:57:30Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Limited data is available on the use of cold-scalpel and electrocautery blades in Cesarean delivery (CD) operations. This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare their use for subcutaneous incisions in terms of blood loss and postoperative pain in women undergoing repeat CD. Methods: A total of 149 women scheduled for elective CD underwent spinal anesthesia, Pfannenstiel transverse skin incision with a cold-scalpel blade, and subsequent subcutaneous incisions until the peritoneum with a cold-scalpel or electrocautery blade. Perioperative blood loss and postoperative pain were evaluated. Results: The groups were similar in terms of maternal age, physical characteristics, and gestational age. The electrocautery group recorded significantly less blood loss and pain at the postoperative 6th and 12th hours. No significant correlation was found between blood loss or pain and women's physical characteristics or gestational age. Discussion: Perioperative and postoperative pain associated with CD is one of the predominant causes of anxiety in mothers. This study demonstrated that the use of electrocautery for subcutaneous incisions was associated with lower blood loss and lower postoperative pain compared to the cold-scalpel incisions in pregnant women undergoing repeat C-sections with Pfannenstiel incision. The study supports the recently shifting trend regarding the use of electrocautery instead of the scalpel. © 2021 S.O.G. CANADA Inc.. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.31083/j.ceog.2021.03.2341
dc.identifier.endpage539en_US
dc.identifier.issn0390-6663en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85108426003en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage534en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog.2021.03.2341
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11363/8288
dc.identifier.volume48en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIMR Press Limiteden_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmz20240903_Gen_US
dc.subjectBlood loss; Cesarean section; Electrocautery; Pfannenstiel incision; Postoperative painen_US
dc.titleComparison of electrocautery and scalpel for blood loss and postoperative pain in Pfannenstiel incisions in recurrent cesarean sections: A randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Makale / Article
Boyut:
3.46 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format