Yazar "Gündoğmuş, İbrahim" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 6 / 6
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Göz Hareketleriyle Duyarsızlaştırma ve Yeniden İşleme (Emdr) Çift Protokolü’nün Çiftlerin İlişki Doyumu, Depresyon Ve Anksiyete Belirtileri Üzerine Etkisi(2021) Doğan, Ceren Kurtay; Gündoğmuş, İbrahim; Yaşar, Alişan Burak[Abstract not Available]Öğe Mental Health Training Characteristics of Psychiatry and Psychology Professionals and Their Reliance on Training Schools in Turkey(Bilişsel Davranışçı Psikoterapiler Derneği, 2022) Yaşar, Alişan Burak; Gündoğmuş, İbrahim; Gündüz, AnılIn the study, we aimed to investigate the psychotherapy schools of psychiatrists and psychologists’ during their training and daily clinical practice and their confidence in different psychotherapy schools. The sample of the study consists of 430 psychologists and psychiatrists reached. Surveys are prepared by consultation with the accredited psychotherapy supervisors from different psychotherapy schools. When comparing psychiatrists and psychologists, psychiatrists significantly attended more to cognitive- behavioral (CBT), psychodynamic, sexual, group, and supportive therapy training (p<0.01), whereas psychologists attended to Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) and family couple therapy training (p<0.01). The most trusted psychotherapy school was CBT (4.58±1.11), while the least trusted psychotherapy school was hypnosis (2.63±1.31). As the duration of psychotherapy training increased, the confidence in that psychotherapy method increased (p<0.001). The current study has shown that psychotherapy practitioners do not have a homogeneous distribution of their psychotherapy training, and these differences reduce their level of confidence in other psychotherapy approaches.Öğe A randomized controlled trial of the effect of cognitive behavioral therapy-based self-help psychotherapy books on anxiety and depressive symptoms: A bibliotherapy study(Kare Publ, 2024) Yaşar, Alişan Burak; Gündoğmuş, İbrahim; Taşdelen, Rumeysa; Taygar, Afra Selma; Uludağ, Esra; Akça, Erdoğdu; Yavuz, Kasım Fatih; Karaosmanoğlu, Alp; Türkçapar, Mehmet HakanObjective: The aim of this study is to compare the effects of self-help psychotherapy books based on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) approaches on anxiety and depressive symptoms, with those of a placebo psychology book and a control group receiving only antidepressant treatment. Method: The current study was conducted with 110 patients admitted to the psychiatric outpatient clinic, diagnosed with depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. The study utilized a book each from CBT, Schema Therapy, Cognitive Therapy, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, and a placebo book. Participants' depressive symptoms were evaluated using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and their anxiety symptoms with the Beck Anxiety Inventory, both before and after the intervention. Results:The median age of participants was 34.71 +/- 10.40, and 80% were female. The difference in BDI decrease between books was found to be statistically significant as a result of a mixed design Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Although the difference in depression scores between the books was not statistically significant according to time in post hoc analyses, when all groups with the books were considered, the difference in depression scores was statistically significant compared to the decrease seen in the group that received only antidepressant treatment, according to the planned contrast analysis. When the analysis was repeated, excluding the group receiving antidepressant treatment, similar results were found in the placebo book group. Conclusion: When compared to the placebo book group and the usual treatment group, self-help books written within the framework of CBT approaches are significantly effective in reducing depressive scores in patients diagnosed with depression and anxiety disorder. Further research is needed to observe the long-term effects of these books.Öğe A Randomized-Controlled Trial of EMDR Flash Technique on Traumatic Symptoms, Depression, Anxiety, Stress, and Life of Quality With Individuals Who Have Experienced a Traffic Accident(FRONTIERS MEDIA SA, AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE CH-1015, SWITZERLAND, 2022) Yaşar, Alişan Burak; Konuk, Emre; Kavakçı, Önder; Uygun, Ersin; Gündoğmuş, İbrahim; Taygar, Afra Selma; Uludağ, EsraThe Flash Technique of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) is widely recognized for its effectiveness in reducing the effects of emotional responses associated with traumatic memories. Using a randomized-controlled trial methodology, this study attempts to establish the efficacy of the EMDR Flash Technique. This study’s sample includes volunteers who were involved in traffic accidents and were given the randomized EMDR Flash Technique and Improving Mental Health Training for Primary Care Residents (mhGAP) Stress management module. The participants were given a socio-demographic data form, the Depression-AnxietyStress 21 scale (DASS-21), the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and the WHOQOL Quality of Life scale. Participants were evaluated using measurements taken before and after the application, as well as a one-month follow-up. The mean age of the participants was 36.20 (11.41) years and 82.1% (n=32) were female. The DASS-21 Anxiety (?2=0.085), IES-R Intrusion (?2=0.101), Avoidance (?2=0.124), Total (?2=0.147), and WHOQOL-BREF Psychological (?2=0.106) score improvements of the EMDR Flash Technique group were shown to be statistically significant when compared to the mhGAP group. However, no statistically significant difference in the DASS-21 Depression, Stress, Impact of Event ScaleRevised Hyperarousal WHOQOL-BREF General Health, Physical, Social Relationships, and Environment component scores was reported between the two groups. The present study’s findings clearly demonstrate that the EMDR Flash technique, when applied to persons involved in traffic accidents, is successful in improving anxiety, intrusion, avoidance, total traumatic stress, and mental quality of life symptoms for at least 1month. We believe that these findings will improve the reliability and applicability of the EMDR Flash Technique, which was tested for the first time in a clinical randomized-controlled trial (RCT).Öğe The effectiveness of online Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing 2.0 Group Protocol on post-traumatic stress disorders symptoms, depression, anxiety, and stress in individuals who have experienced a traffic accident: a randomized-controlled study(FRONTIERS MEDIA SA, AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE CH-1015, SWITZERLAND, 2025) Yaşar, Alişan Burak; Gündoğmuş, İbrahim; Kubilay, Derin; Tunca, Görkem Alban; Uygun, Ersin; Çiftci, Zeynep Zat; Kavakçı, ÖnderIntroduction: EMDR 2.0, an innovative approach rooted in the conventional Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), has garnered attention due to its promising outcomes. The application of EMDR, whether it is EMDR or EMDR 2.0 protocol, in a group format, especially for conditions like PostTraumatic Stress Disorder, will provide significant opportunities in terms of economic feasibility and accessibility, ultimately leading to widespread use. Building on the established effectiveness of EMDR 2.0 in individual applications, this study examines its impact in group settings. This protocol is designed to provide a structured framework for implementing EMDR 2.0 within group contexts, paving the way for a nuanced understanding of its potential benefits in collective therapeutic settings. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of the online EMDR 2.0 Group Protocol(EMDR 2.0 GP) versus Improving Mental Health Training for Primary Care Residents(mhGAP) on individuals with a history of traffic accidents in a controlled way. Methods: In this randomized-controlled study sample includes volunteers who were involved in traffic accidents and were given the randomized online EMDR 2.0 GP and mhGAP Stress management module. The participants were given a sociodemographic data form, Depression Anxiety Stress 21 scale (DASS-21) and Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R). Participants were evaluated with measurements before, after and “one month after the application. Results: The mean age of the participants was 34.80(8.10) years and 88.0% (n=22) were female. The change in DASS-21 Anxiety (h2 =0.136), Stress (h2 =0.140), IES-R Avoidance (h2 =0.134), Hyperarousal (h2 =0.0148), Total (h2 =0.223) scores of online EMDR 2.0 GP was determined to be statistically significant compared to the mhGAP group. However, no statistically significant difference was observed in DASS-21 Depression (h2 =0.017), IES-R Intrusion (h2 =0.094), scores between the two groups. Discussion: The RCT of online EMDR 2.0 GP indicated that this newly developed protocol, when applied to groups, may be effective in reducing anxiety, stress, and traumatic symptoms among a non-clinical sample. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/, identifier NCT05596903.Öğe Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-Revised(KOREAN NEUROPSYCHIATRIC ASSOC, RN 522, G-FIVE CENTRAL PLAZA 1685-8 SEOCHO 4-DONG, SEOCHO-GU, SEOUL 137-882, SOUTH KOREA, 2021) Gündüz, Anıl; Gündoğmuş, İbrahim; Sertçelik, Sencan; Engin, Betül Hacer; İşler, Aysel; Yaşar, Alişan Burak; Gönül, Hatice; Çipil, Arif; Usta Gündüz, Elvan BaşakObjective This study aims to assess the psychometric values of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-Revised (GADS-R) which measures the intensity and duration of worry, various coping and avoidance strategies to cope with worrying, and positive and negative metacognitive beliefs about worrying. Methods 114 patients with generalized anxiety disorder and 198 healthy controls were included in the study. These patients were diagnosed according to DSM-IV TR, and the primary diagnosis of the patients was generalized anxiety disorder which was confirmed via SCID I and II, subsequently. Sociodemographic form, GADS-R total and subscale scores, and Meta-Cognitions Questionnaire-30 (MCQ30), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Scale (GAD-7), and Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) were used to assess validity, reliability and cut-off point. Results GADS-R total and subscale scores and MCQ-30, BDI, BAI, GAD-7, and PSWQ were found to be statistically higher in the patients with GAD compared to a healthy control group. GADS-R has five factors and showed relatively acceptable sensitivity and specificity for detecting anxiety disorders at a cut-off point of 1188. Conclusion The GADS-R is a valid and reliable scale that can be used in the Turkish population as an assessment tool.