dc.contributor.author | Kinoshita, Shotaro | |
dc.contributor.author | Cortright, Kelley | |
dc.contributor.author | Crawford, Allison | |
dc.contributor.author | Mizuno, Yuya | |
dc.contributor.author | Yoshida, Kazunari | |
dc.contributor.author | Hilty, Donald | |
dc.contributor.author | Guinart, Daniel | |
dc.contributor.author | Torous, John | |
dc.contributor.author | Correll, Christoph U. | |
dc.contributor.author | Castle, David J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Rocha, Deyvis | |
dc.contributor.author | Yang, Yuan | |
dc.contributor.author | Xiang, Yu-Tao | |
dc.contributor.author | Kolbaek, Pernille | |
dc.contributor.author | Dines, David | |
dc.contributor.author | Elshami, Mohammad | |
dc.contributor.author | Jain, Prakhar | |
dc.contributor.author | Kallivayalil, Roy | |
dc.contributor.author | Solmi, Marco | |
dc.contributor.author | Favaro, Angela | |
dc.contributor.author | Veronese, Nicola | |
dc.contributor.author | Seedat, Soraya | |
dc.contributor.author | Shin, Sangho | |
dc.contributor.author | Salazar de Pablo, Gonzalo | |
dc.contributor.author | Chang, Chun-Hung | |
dc.contributor.author | Su, Kuan-Pin | |
dc.contributor.author | Karaş, Hakan | |
dc.contributor.author | Kane, John M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Yellowlees, Peter | |
dc.contributor.author | Kishimoto, Taishiro | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-02T07:13:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-02T07:13:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0033-2917 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1469-8978 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11363/6176 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of telemedicine as a way to reduce
COVID-19 infections was noted and consequently deregulated. However, the degree of telemedicine regulation varies from country to country, which may alter the widespread use of
telemedicine. This study aimed to clarify the telepsychiatry regulations for each collaborating
country/region before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods. We used snowball sampling within a global network of international telepsychiatry
experts. Thirty collaborators from 17 different countries/regions responded to a questionnaire
on barriers to the use and implementation of telepsychiatric care, including policy factors such
as regulations and reimbursement at the end of 2019 and as of May 2020.
Results. Thirteen of 17 regions reported a relaxation of regulations due to the pandemic; consequently, all regions surveyed stated that telepsychiatry was now possible within their public
healthcare systems. In some regions, restrictions on prescription medications allowed via telepsychiatry were eased, but in 11 of the 17 regions, there were still restrictions on prescribing
medications via telepsychiatry. Lower insurance reimbursement amounts for telepsychiatry
consultations v. in-person consultations were reevaluated in four regions, and consequently,
in 15 regions telepsychiatry services were reimbursed at the same rate (or higher) than inperson consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Conclusions. Our results confirm that, due to COVID-19, the majority of countries surveyed
are altering telemedicine regulations that had previously restricted the spread of telemedicine.
These findings provide information that could guide future policy and regulatory decisions,
which facilitate greater scale and spread of telepsychiatry globally. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS, 32 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, NEW YORK, NY 10013-2473 | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1017/S0033291720004584 | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ | * |
dc.subject | COVID-19 | en_US |
dc.subject | government regulation | en_US |
dc.subject | health insurance reimbursement | en_US |
dc.subject | telemedicine | en_US |
dc.subject | telepsychiatry | en_US |
dc.title | Changes in telepsychiatry regulations during the COVID-19 pandemic: 17 countries and regions’ approaches to an evolving healthcare landscape | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Psychological Medicine | en_US |
dc.department | İktisadi İdari ve Sosyal Bilimler Fakültesi | en_US |
dc.authorid | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8168-383X | en_US |
dc.authorid | https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0557-8648 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 52 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 13 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 2606 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 2613 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.institutionauthor | Karaş, Hakan | |