dc.contributor.author | Keki, Başak | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-03T15:45:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-03T15:45:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1303-4251 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2645-8950 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11363/5733 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper challenges Jerome Stolnitz’s view that art cannot teach us anything but
merely offers truisms, which he asserts in his article “On the Cognitive Triviality
of Art”. The current inquiry is limited to fiction and explores the relationship
between aesthetics and morality and their cognitive and emotional implications.
Employing the contemporary debates surrounding the literature, I defend the view
that fiction can offer us moral truth beyond truisms through the reader’s
interaction with the text as she employs her imaginative, moral and emotional
faculties throughout the unique process of reading.
Stolnitz’s first worry is that the cognitive value of fiction is superficial, and the
“message” of a text hardly qualifies as knowledge. He bases his argument on the
case that artistic truth doesn’t exist because there are no experts who could judge
the epistemic status of knowledge on arts; hence there is no such thing as artistic
knowledge – and without knowledge, art cannot teach us anything. Even if fiction
offers certain conceptions which may evoke moral wisdom, they are already stale
truisms devoid of cognitive worth. I respond to this criticism by proposing that
works of fiction contain a different type of knowledge; the type of know-how
rather than know-that which alludes to moral knowledge.
Stolnitz’s second worry is that the moral themes contained in fiction can fit in a
sentence or two, without us having to bother to read the whole text. My response
is that the act of interaction with the text is an indispensable part of enhancing our
emotional and moral education which helps us cultivate our moral imagination.
Similar to any thought experiment in philosophical arguments, fiction helps us
direct our moral attention and evaluate diverse (moral) possibilities. The process
of reading allows us to acquire a moral space or distance from which we can
formulate moral responses to what happens in the text. Cultivating moral
judgment takes time; and it is this time consuming act of reading the text which
enables us to critically engage with the text. Learning from fiction entails an
internal change we undergo in our being; and the greater the literary work is, the
more we can learn from it. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Bursa Uludağ University | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ | * |
dc.subject | Fiction | en_US |
dc.subject | Artistic Truth | en_US |
dc.subject | Aesthetics | en_US |
dc.subject | Moral Knowledge | en_US |
dc.subject | Moral Cognition | en_US |
dc.subject | Moral Imagination | en_US |
dc.title | Can Fiction Offer Moral Truth Beyond Truisms? | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Kaygı Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi | en_US |
dc.department | İktisadi İdari ve Sosyal Bilimler Fakültesi | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 0 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 27 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 231 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 243 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.institutionauthor | Keki, Başak | |