Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorŞenocak, Emre
dc.contributor.authorKorkut, Elif
dc.contributor.authorAktürk, Adem
dc.contributor.authorYıldız Özer, Aysel
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-04T12:23:30Z
dc.date.available2023-04-04T12:23:30Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.issn1590-1874
dc.identifier.issn1590-3478
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11363/4300
dc.description.abstractBackground Trunk stabilization, which is a factor that directly afects the performance of afected upper-limb movements in stroke patients, is of critical importance in the performance of selective motor control. Aims This study aimed to investigate the efects on upper-limb motor function of the addition of robotic rehabilitation (RR) and conventional rehabilitation (CR) to intensive trunk rehabilitation (ITR). Methods A total of 41 subacute stroke patients were randomly allocated to two groups: RR and CR. Both groups received the same ITR procedure. Following ITR, a robot-assisted rehabilitation program of 60 min, 5 days a week, for 6 weeks, was applied to the RR group, and an individualized upper-limb rehabilitation to the CR group. Assessments were made at baseline and after 6 weeks using the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS), Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Evaluation Scale (FMA-UE), and Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). Results Improvements were obtained in the TIS, FMA-UE, and WMFT scores for both groups (p<0.001), with no superiority detected between the groups (p>0.05). The RR group scores were relatively high, but not to a statistically signifcant. Conclusions When added to intensive trunk rehabilitation, the robot-assisted systems, which are recommended as a standalone therapy method, produced similar results to conventional therapies. This technology can be used as an alternative to conventional methods under appropriate conditions of clinical opportunity, access, time management, and staf limitations. However, when RR is combined with traditional interventions such as intensive trunk rehabilitation, it is essential to investigate if the real efect is due to the robotic rehabilitation or the accumulation of positive efects of excessive movement or force spread associated with trained muscles. Registration This trial was retrospectively registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov with NCT05559385 registration number (25/09/2022).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRLVIA DECEMBRIO, 28, MILAN 20137, ITALYen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s10072-023-06739-3en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectStrokeen_US
dc.subjectIntensive trunk rehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectRobotic rehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectMotor functionen_US
dc.subjectConventional rehabilitationen_US
dc.titleIs the robotic rehabilitation that is added to intensive body rehabilitation effective for maximization of upper extremity motor recovery following a stroke? A randomized controlled studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofNeurological Sciencesen_US
dc.departmentSağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokuluen_US
dc.authoridhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-3677-9813en_US
dc.authoridhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-4778-3781en_US
dc.authoridhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-2487-5720en_US
dc.authoridhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-0739-6143en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage9en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aksi belirtilmediği sürece bu öğenin lisansı: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess