Hexagonal Barbell Deadlift One-repetition Maximum Estimation Using Velocity Recordings

dc.authoridGarcía-Ramos, Amador/0000-0003-0608-8755
dc.authoridJanicijevic, Danica/0000-0001-9925-7751
dc.contributor.authorJanicijevic, Danica
dc.contributor.authorŞentürk, Deniz
dc.contributor.authorAkyıldız, Zeki
dc.contributor.authorGu, Yaodong
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Ramos, Amador
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-11T19:51:25Z
dc.date.available2024-09-11T19:51:25Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to determine whether the optimal minimal velocity threshold (MVT) provides more precise estimates of one-repetition maximum (1RM) in the hexagonal barbell deadlift (HBD) than the general and individual MVTs. The 1RMs of 27 resistance-trained males were predicted using three types of MVT: (i) General MVT: averaged across subjects' velocity of the 1RM trial (0.25 ms -1 ), (ii) individual MVT: velocity attained during the 1RM trial, and (iii) Optimal MVT: MVT that eliminated the differences between the actual and predicted 1RM. Two individual load-velocity relationships were modelled considering five (30-50-70-80%1RM) or six (30-50-70-80-90%1RM) loading conditions. Negligible differences (Effect size<0.20), low absolute errors (<5% of the actual 1RM), and extremely high correlations ( r >0.90) were observed between the actual and six predicted 1RMs. The only significant difference was the lower raw errors for the 90%1RM condition (0.60 +/- 7.34 kg) compared to the 80%1RM condition (2.27 +/- 7.54 kg; p =0.013). These results suggest that the individual load-velocity relationship offers an accurate estimation of the HBD 1RM in resistance-trained males, and these estimates could maintain similar levels of precision across different types of MVT (general, individual, and optimal) and final tested loads (80%1RM and 90%1RM).en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Natural Science Foundation of China [12250410237]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant 12250410237. We extend our sincere gratitude to all participants for their unwavering commitment to this study.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1055/a-2330-3001
dc.identifier.issn0172-4622
dc.identifier.issn1439-3964
dc.identifier.pmid38768640en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85194910817en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1055/a-2330-3001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11363/7783
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001272436200002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherGeorg Thieme Verlag Kgen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Sports Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.snmz20240903_Gen_US
dc.subjectmuscle strengthen_US
dc.subjectresistance trainingen_US
dc.subjectvelocity-based trainingen_US
dc.subjectweight liftingen_US
dc.titleHexagonal Barbell Deadlift One-repetition Maximum Estimation Using Velocity Recordingsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar