Effect of decision premises that resolve issues on workers: case of Istanbul textile industry
Özet
The main object of this paper is to shed light on behaviors of organization members. Despite the
general acceptance the modest empirical support for the organizational behavior assumptions of
March and Simon (1958) were in need of further inspections. We build the hypothesis on
interpretation of March and Simon as follows: 1- When aspirations are unsatisfied, people search
until they find better, more satisfying options. Being on the same idea one could not say that -
When aspirations are unsatisfied, people don’t care about the objectives of organization. 2-
Organizations influence individuals primarily by managing the information and options, or “decision
premises,” that they consider. In other words we may not argue that - Organizations’ decision
premises consideration does not influence individuals to decide how to act. 3- Individuals find it
easier and less taxing to devote limited time and energy to programmed tasks. In the same
occasion one could not interpreted that - individuals acts rational and result based, they are eager
to innovations (Greve, 2007: 945). To resolve confirmation a study has been conducted with a
random sample of Istanbul Textile Industry. This work confirmed all three assumptions of March and
Simon which set up the hypotheses. First of three sections of the study was a review on
foundations of decision making in organizations. Second section checked for the consistency of
March and Simon’s pioneering work in current conjuncture. And in the third section concluded as
supposed they were still current.
Cilt
6Sayı
1Koleksiyonlar
Aşağıdaki lisans dosyası bu öğe ile ilişkilidir: